Published on in Vol 9 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/56028, first published .
Online Health Information–Seeking Behaviors Among the Chongqing Population: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Online Health Information–Seeking Behaviors Among the Chongqing Population: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Online Health Information–Seeking Behaviors Among the Chongqing Population: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

1Department of Health Education, School of Military Preventive Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Gaotanyan Street No 30, Shapingba District, Chongqing, China

2Chongqing Health Education Institute, Chongqing, China

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Ji-an Chen, PhD


Background: With the rapid development of the internet and its widespread use, online health information–seeking (OHIS) has become a popular and important research topic. Various benefits of OHIS are well recognized. However, OHIS seems to be a mixed blessing. Research on OHIS has been reported in Western countries and in high-income regions in eastern China. Studies on the population in the western region of China, such as Chongqing, are still limited.

Objective: The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence, common topics, and common methods of health information–seeking and the factors influencing these behaviors among the Chongqing population.

Methods: This cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted from September to October 2021. A web-based questionnaire was sent to users aged 15 years and older in Chongqing using a Chinese web-based survey hosting site (N=14,466). Data on demographics, web-based health information resources, and health topics were collected. Factors that may influence health literacy were assessed using the chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 67.1% (9704/14,466) of the participants displayed OHIS behaviors. Participants who were younger, had a higher educational level, and worked as medical staff or teachers were more likely to engage in OHIS, while those living in rural areas, ethnic minorities, and farmers were less likely to seek health information on the web (P<.01). Among the Chongqing population, the most common topic searched on the internet was health behavior and literacy (87.4%, 8483/9704), and the most popular method of seeking health information on the web was through WeChat (77.0%, 7468/9704).

Conclusions: OHIS is prevalent in Chongqing. Further research could be performed based on the influencing factors identified herein and high-priority, effective ways of improving the OHIS behaviors of the Chongqing population.

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56028

doi:10.2196/56028

Keywords



With rapid development, the internet has become a major source of health information worldwide. According to Internet World Stats [1], there are 5 billion internet users, accounting for more than 60% of the world population. China also has a large population of internet users. In 2020, approximately 9.89 million Chinese people (70.4% of the Chinese population) had access to the internet [2]. The internet hosts a tremendous amount and variety of health-related information that can be accessed at conveniently, anonymously, and at relatively low cost [3,4]. Among all health information sources, the internet has the highest usage rate [5-7]. Although certain groups still rely on traditional sources such as books and printed journals for health information [8], web-based sources of health information are increasingly growing in popularity.

Various benefits of online health information–seeking (OHIS) are well recognized. Patients turning to the internet before seeking medical consultations or diagnosis may help improve patient-doctor relationships, and patients are more inclined to trust their physicians’ advice when they are able to discuss the information they found on the web with their doctors [9-12]. As individuals aim to change their lifestyle or health behavior, the frequency of the use of the internet to retrieve health information is likely to increase [13]. For people with chronic diseases, OHIS may help them manage their health condition [14,15]. However, OHIS seems to be a mixed blessing. Studies have reported that the overall quality of web-based health information is relatively low [16-18]. Information seekers are at risk of making hasty or dangerous health decisions based on questionable web-based information [19]. In contrast to the information available in Western countries, low-quality web-based health information seems to be particularly prevalent in Asian countries [20].

With the rapid development of the internet and its widespread use, OHIS has become a popular and important research topic. Research on OHIS has been reported in Western countries [8,14,21] as well as low- and middle-income countries [22-24]. Various factors, such as age, gender, education, and internet usage, have been shown to affect the prevalence and extent of OHIS in previous studies [13,22,25]. In addition, researchers have been interested in the topic of OHIS. A previous study also reported that various health topics are searched by web-based health information seekers. The most common topics searched on the internet are likely to fall under 2 categories: health behavior, such as nutrition or diet, exercise, and body maintenance; and medical concerns, including information related to disease, medications, and treatments [11,14,22,26]. In recent years, several academic studies on OHIS have collected evidence from high-income regions in eastern China, such as Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Hong Kong [26-30]. Western China, as a transitional region—home to 27% of the national population with distinct socioeconomic and health care system characteristics—remains critically underresearched [31]. This knowledge gap limits our understanding of the situation of OHIS thoroughly in this vast country with uneven development. Chongqing, as the largest municipality in western China, embodies the region’s characteristic “urban-rural dual structure” with more than a 60% urbanization rate and significant health resource disparities between metropolitan and rural areas [32]. This metropolis is an ideal context for understanding situation of OHIS in western China.

The study objectives were to (1) determine the prevalence, common topics, and methods of OHIS in the Chongqing population and (2) identify the factors that influence the OHIS behaviors of this population. This research may help improve ways of promoting efficient and appropriate OHIS for users and harnessing the benefits of the internet as a source of health information.


Study Design

From September to October 2021, Chongqing Health Education Institution and the Army Medical University carried out a web-based study to assess residents’ health care needs in Chongqing municipality. The target participants were Chongqing residents. A survey QR code was disseminated on popular Chinese social media applications such as WeChat for voluntary participation in our web-based survey, which was hosted on the Chinese Sojump site. The first page of the survey was a web-based consent form including study information. After reading the consent forms and indicating consent to participate in the survey, respondents were allowed to proceed. To avoid multiple submissions, only one submission per IP address was allowed. Ultimately, 14,466 participants were included in this study.

Measures

This questionnaire included 2 parts: demographic characteristics and OHIS behaviors. Demographic characteristics included age, gender, education, occupation, ethnicity, and area of residence, gender, education, and ethnicity. Age was measured by asking participants to indicate their numeric age, and other variables were measured with multiple-choice questions. The part on OHIS behaviors were included three questions. The first one dealt addressed having experience with OHIS, wherein participants’ OHIS behavior was measured with a single question, “Which sources are your main sources for seeking health information?” The response options included books and journals, broadcasts, television, PCs (desktops and laptops), mobile phones, lectures, professional staff, and advertisements. Participants who chose PCs and/or mobile phones as their main sources for seeking health information were considered to have experience with OHIS. The second one addressed major health topics in OHIS: health topics that the participants searched on the internet were captured by a multiple-choice question with response options including health behavior and literacy (such as diet, fitness, exercise, and drug usage), infectious diseases, chronic disease, first aid, and health policies (such as medical insurance). Participants could select one or more answers as their major health topics when searching on the internet. The third one addressed the main method of OHIS: the main method of seeking health information on the web was measured with a single item with response options including WeChat, Weibo, search engines (such as Baidu and Google), websites, short-video apps (such as TikTok), and others. Participants could select one or more answers as their main method of seeking health information on the web.

Ethical Considerations

The study was carried out in accordance with ethical principals and was approved by the ethics review board of the Army Medical University (2023-5-02). Participants provided informed consent. All participants’ information was anonymized. There was no financial compensation for patients or researchers nor any source of funding that could lead to a conflict of interest for the study.

Statistical Analysis

All data were input into an Epidata database (version 3.1) after checking and correcting errors. SPSS (version 22.0; IBM Corp) was used for analyses. A descriptive analysis (frequencies, percentages, and means with SDs) of the participant characteristics was performed. The chi-square test was used to compare OHIS behaviors among groups. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the influencing factors associated with OHIS. Statistical significance was set to a P value of <.05 (2-sided).


Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Study Sample

The demographic characteristics of the study sample are listed in Table 1. In total, 67.1% (9704/14,466) of the participants had OHIS experience. The average age was 46.2 (SD 18.0) years, while approximately half (51.8%, 7495/14,466) of the participants were younger than 45 years. More than half (52.0%, 7520/14,466) of the participants were female. Most participants (95.3%, 13,793/14,466) were of Han Chinese ethnicity. The percentage of participants residing in urban areas was 69.7% (10,090/14,466). Overall, 47.1% (6813/14,466) of participants were college graduates or had a higher level of education. The participants spanned all occupation groups.

As indicated in Table 1, OHIS experience significantly differed by age, ethnicity, area of residence, education and occupation (P<.05) but not by gender.

Table 1. Differences in the OHISa characteristics of the respondents and their sociodemographic characteristics (N=14,466).
CharacteristicsParticipants, n (%)Respondents without OHIS experience, n (%)Respondents with OHIS experience, n (%)P value
Age (years)
 15‐457495 (51.8)1208 (25.4)6287 (64.8)<.001
 46‐603036 (21.0)790 (16.6)2246 (23.1)
 61 or older3935 (27.2)2764 (58.0)1171 (12.1)
Gender
 Male6946 (48.0)2308 (48.5)4638 (47.8).46
 Female7520 (52.0)2454 (51.5)5066 (52.2)
Ethnicity
 Han Chinese13,793 (95.3)4513 (94.8)9280 (95.6).02
 Ethnic minority673 (4.7)249 (5.2)424 (4.4)
Area of residence
 Urban10,090 (69.7)2587 (54.3)7503 (77.3)<.001
 Rural4376 (30.3)2175 (45.7)2201 (22.7)
Education level
 Primary school or less2998 (20.7)2301 (48.3)697 (7.2)<.001
 Junior high school2467 (17.1)1020 (21.4)1447 (14.9)
 Senior high school2188 (15.1)514 (10.8)1674 (17.3)
 College graduate6289 (43.5)855 (18.0)5434 (56.0)
 Postgraduate524 (3.6)72 (1.5)452 (4.7)
Occupation
 Civil servants1669 (11.5)253 (5.3)1416 (14.6)<.001
 Teachers1208 (8.4)150 (3.1)1058 (10.9)
 Medical staff1603 (11.1)223 (4.7)1380 (14.2)
 Staff in public institutions969 (6.7)175 (3.7)794 (8.2)
 Students887 (6.1)171 (3.6)716 (7.4)
 Farmers3317 (22.9)2266 (47.6)1051 (10.8)
 Workers1180 (8.2)407 (8.5)773 (8.0)
 Enterprise personnel1250 (8.6)238 (5.0)1012 (10.4)
 Others2383 (16.5)879 (18.5)1504 (15.5)

aOHIS: online health information–seeking.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With the Rate of Health Literacy Knowledge

The variables with statistical significance in the chi-square test (Table 1) were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. As shown in Table 2, participants aged 46‐60 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.782, 95% CI 0.695-0.880) or more than 61 years (OR 0.298, 95% CI 0.260-0.341) were less likely to have OHIS experience than those younger than 20 years. Participants who belonged to ethnic minorities (OR 0.621, 95% CI 0.513-0.752) were less likely to have OHIS experience than Han Chinese participants. Participants from rural areas (OR 0.815, 95% CI 0.734-0.906) were less likely to have OHIS experience than urban participants. Compared to the respondents with primary school education and below, those with junior high school education (OR 2.290, 95% CI 2.000-2.622), senior high school education (OR 3.274, 95% CI 2.765-3.877), college graduate degrees (OR 5.012, 95% CI 4.163-6.033), and postgraduate education (OR 4.809, 95% CI 3.442-6.720) were more likely to have OHIS experience. Based on the participants’ occupation, compared to civil servants, teachers (OR 1.407, 95% CI 1.118-1.770) and medical staff (OR 1.359, 95% CI 1.098-1.683) were more likely to seek health information on the web, while farmers (OR 0.656, 95% CI 0.525-0.820) were less likely to seek health information on the internet.

Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with OHISa in participants.
CharacteristicsORb95% CIP value
Age (years)
 15‐451c —d —
 46‐600.7820.695‐0.880<.001
 61 or older0.2980.260‐0.341<.001
Gender
 Male1 — —
 Female0.9500.871‐1.036.24
Ethnicity
 Han Chinese1 — —
 Ethnic minority0.6210.513‐0.752<.001
Area of residence
 Urban1 — —
 Rural0.8150.734‐0.906<.001
Education
 Primary school or less1 — —
 Junior high school2.2902.000‐2.622<.001
 Senior high school3.2742.765‐3.877<.001
 College graduate5.0124.163‐6.033<.001
 Postgraduate4.8093.442‐6.720<.001
Occupation
 Civil servants1 — —
 Teachers1.4071.118‐1.770.004
 Medical staff1.3591.098‐1.683.005
 Staff in public institution1.1000.872‐1.837.421
 Students1.2790.979‐1.672.072
 Farmers0.6560.525‐0.820<.001
 Workers0.9050.721‐1.135.385
 Enterprise personnel1.0520.843‐1.313.652
 Others1.0350.843‐1.272.740

aOHIS: online health information–seeking.

bOR: odds ratio.

cReference variable.

dNot applicable.

Health Topics Searched on the Internet by Participants With OHIS Experience

Table 3 shows the health topics searched on the internet by the study participants. Most of the participants (8483/9704, 87.4%) indicated that they sought information about health behavior and literacy. More than three-quarters of the participants used the internet to find information about infectious diseases (78.6%, 7628/9704), chronic diseases (76.0%, 7375/9704), and first aid (75.0%, 7277/9704). More than half (58.6%, 5688/9704) of the participants searched for health policy information on the web.

Table 3. Common health topics searched on the internet by participants with OHISa experience (N=9704).
TopicsParticipants, n (%)
Health behavior and literacy8483 (87.4)
Infectious diseases7628 (78.6)
Chronic disease7375 (76.0)
First aid7277 (75.0)
Health policies5688 (58.6)

aOHIS: online health information–seeking.

Sources of Web-Based Health Information Among Participants With OHIS Experience

Participants reported 1 or more different sources of health information that they sought on the web. The majority of participants (7468/9704, 77.0%) used WeChat. More than half of the participants indicated that search engines (5547/9704, 57.2%) and short-video apps (5359/9704, 55.2%) were their main sources. A total of 4079 out of 9704 (42.0%) participants used Weibo. Websites and web-based courses were used for seeking health information on the web by 36.3% (3527/9704) and 31.3% (3034/9704) of participants, respectively. The prevalence of the source of web-based health information among the participants with OHIS experience is shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Source of online health information among the participants with OHIS experience (N=9704).
SourcesParticipants, n (%)
WeChat7468 (77.0)
Weibo4079 (42.0)
Search engines5547 (57.2)
Websites3527 (36.3)
Web-based courses3034 (31.3)
Short-video apps5359 (55.2)
Others418 (4.3)

aOHIS: online health information–seeking.


Principal Findings

In this study, more than 67% of participants sought health information on the internet, which is similar to recent studies reporting extensive internet use and highly prevalent OHIS [22,24,26,33]. The internet has the highest usage rate among health information sources [5-7]. The results from our study suggested that among the Chongqing population, the internet has become a major source for seeking health information, which is consistent with other reports. How to provide more high-quality health information on the web may be a key objective for public health policies and practices in Chongqing.

In this study, younger participants were more likely to seek health information on the web than older participants. Similar results were also reported in some previous studies [22,30,33,34]. IT, including health IT, is usually accessible for younger generations [35]. Therefore, younger populations may more frequently seek health information on the internet.

We also found evidence of disparities in OHIS by ethnicity in Chongqing. This result was similar to those of previous studies showing that racial or ethnic minorities were less likely to use web-based resources to seek health information [33,36,37]. A possible reason may be that differences in cultural values, care preferences, and perceived benefits of web-based health information likely contributed to these differential rates of use [36-38]. Previous research has shown that health communication in a multicultural society mainly takes the dominant culture into account, often neglecting those of nondominant groups [39-41]. In China, Han is the dominant ethnicity. This is likely secondary in part to the limited availability of web-based sources such as health-related websites and patient-provider portals in ethnic minorities other than the majority [42]. In Chongqing, the population of ethnic minorities is more than 2 million [32]. Considering the benefits of OHIS, providing web-based health information that is suitable for racial or ethnic minorities may contribute to health improvement in the multiethnic region.

Participants who lived in urban areas were more likely to use the internet to seek health information. This result corroborates previous findings that the urban population had a higher rate of OHIS [33,34,43,44]. A possible reason may be the digital divide between the urban and rural participants in this study. Although there are more than 1 billion netizens in China, people living in urban areas more easily access the internet [45]. Goldner et al [44] reported that lower internet access was associated with fewer web-based health behaviors. Therefore, eliminating the digital divide may help the rural population benefit from these resources.

In this study, a higher education level was associated with the highest odds of OHIS among the Chongqing population. This finding was in line with those of previous studies [22,27,29,30,33,34,38]. Seeking health information on the web requires not only access to technology but also the ability to retrieve, understand, and use information [46]. In addition, the vast majority of web-based patient resources contain health information that is above the reading level of most users [47,48]. Although a substantial proportion of lesser educated individuals have significant health care needs, they often encounter difficulties in finding acceptable information on the web [49]. Continued efforts to ensure that web-based health information is easy to read, understand, and retrieve are needed.

We also found that occupation was associated with the rate of OHIS behavior. In this study, participants who were medical staff or teachers were more likely to use the internet to seek health information. The reason may be that medical staff and teachers more often have higher education levels, higher socioeconomic status, and easier access to web-based resources. In addition, due to their duties, medical staff and teachers often conduct health education for patients and students, and the internet has a tremendous amount and variety of health-related information [3,4]. Therefore, they may have a higher ability and willingness to seek health information on the internet [50]. Farmers in our study were less likely to use web-based sources for seeking health information. This finding was similar to that of a previous study in Zhejiang province [29]. Farmers always live in rural areas. Due to the digital divide between urban and rural areas, farmers may have more difficulty accessing the internet [44,45].

In this study, participants reported seeking web-based health information for a broad range of health topics, including health behavior and literacy, infectious diseases, chronic disease, first aid, and health policies. Health behavior and literacy are the most common topics searched on the internet. This finding is similar to those of previous studies in which health behavior, lifestyle, and health science popularization were most commonly searched for types of web-based health information among the Chinese general or younger population [27,28]. In recent years, the Chinese government has tended to use social media to improve public health literacy and health status among Chinese citizens and has encouraged the dissemination of health science popularization information in various ways [51-53]. The increasing popularity of social media and the ever-growing number of official accounts of health science popularization might have attracted many Chinese netizens to use such information to improve their health behavior and literacy.

We found that WeChat was the most commonly used source for OHIS on the internet. A previous study reported that the number of WeChat customers has exceeded 900 million, with 150 million customers using the web for at least 2 hours every day [54]. A nationwide survey in China found that one-third of participants regularly read health information articles on WeChat, and more than 90% of the participants chose to use WeChat for health information seeking, indicating that a WeChat account is the most popular platform for acquiring health information in China [55]. However, due to growing OHIS behaviors, increasing numbers of nonauthorized social media accounts share biased or inaccurate health information; continued efforts are needed to improve the quality of health information on social media [56-58]. Improving perceived eHealth literacy among netizens and feedback-seeking behavior in digital environments would be useful to increase OHIS, and may finally help to improve public health among Chongqing Population [59,60].

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, this study was conducted in Chongqing, and the results may not be generalizable to the general population in China. Second, due to the nature of a cross-sectional survey, it is difficult to draw causal conclusions. Third, as a hot topic of OHIS in this study, failing to examine the effect of the COVID-19 on OHIS was a significant study limitation.

Conclusion

In summary, OHIS is prevalent in Chongqing. We found that participants who were younger, lived in an urban area, had a higher educational level, and worked as medical staff or teachers were more likely to engage in OHIS, while ethnic minorities and farmers were less likely to seek health information on the web. Among the Chongqing population, the most common topics sought on the internet were health behavior and literacy, and the most popular method of OHIS was through WeChat. According to the identified influencing factors, future research could focus on bridging the digital divide between urban and rural areas, providing higher-quality web-based health information, and examining cultural barriers to health information access among ethnic minority groups. These efforts may help to enhance Chongqing residents’ ability to obtain web-based health resources and ultimately improve public health outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Ji-an Chen and Qinghua Yang are co-corresponding authors, the latter of which can be contacted using the following information: phone number 86 02367168619 and email address [email protected]. We acknowledge all participants in the study.

Data Availability

The datasets used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: HR, J-aC, and QY

Data collection: TG, XL, YL, and HR

Data curation: HR, LL, and DY

Formal analysis: LL, HR, and LZ

Investigation: TG, XL, YL, HR, and LL

Methodology: HR, J-aC, and LL

Software: EL, LZ, FL, and DY

Supervision: J-aC

Validation: TG, QT, and FL

Visualization: LL and HR

Writing—original draft: LL and HR

Writing—review and editing: LL, CZ, FL, and TL

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. World internet users and 2021 population stats. Internet World Stats. 2021. URL: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm [Accessed 2025-04-03]
  2. The 47th statistical report on China’s internet development. China Internet Network Information Center. 2021. URL: https://www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202104/P020210420557302172744.pdf [Accessed 2025-04-03]
  3. Solberg LB. The benefits of online health communities. Virtual Mentor. Apr 1, 2014;16(4):270-274. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. Dec 2001;16(6):671-692. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Cherrez Ojeda I, Vanegas E, Torres M, et al. Ecuadorian cancer patients’ preference for information and communication technologies: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. Feb 20, 2018;20(2):e50. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Cash T, Desbrow B, Leveritt M, Ball L. Utilization and preference of nutrition information sources in Australia. Health Expect. Dec 2015;18(6):2288-2295. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Khoong EC, Le GM, Hoskote M, Rivadeneira NA, Hiatt RA, Sarkar U. Health information-seeking behaviors and preferences of a diverse, multilingual urban cohort. Med Care. Jun 2019;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 6 2):S176-S183. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Jacobs W, Amuta AO, Jeon KC. Health information seeking in the digital age: an analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Social Sciences. Jan 1, 2017;3(1):1302785. [CrossRef]
  9. Peng Y, Yin P, Deng Z, Wang R. Patient-physician interaction and trust in online health community: the role of perceived usefulness of health information and services. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Dec 24, 2019;17(1):1-13. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Tan SSL, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. Jan 19, 2017;19(1):e9. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Rider T, Malik M, Chevassut T. Haematology patients and the internet--the use of on-line health information and the impact on the patient-doctor relationship. Patient Educ Couns. Nov 2014;97(2):223-238. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Moreland J, French TL, Cumming GP. The prevalence of online health information seeking among patients in Scotland: a cross-sectional exploratory study. JMIR Res Protoc. Jul 15, 2015;4(3):e85. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Ayers SL, Kronenfeld JJ. Chronic illness and health-seeking information on the internet. Health (London). Jul 2007;11(3):327-347. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Madrigal L, Escoffery C. Electronic health behaviors among US adults with chronic disease: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. Mar 5, 2019;21(3):e11240. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Jin Y, Jing M, Zhang L, Song S, Ma X. Internet access and hypertension management among the elderly population: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in China. J Med Internet Res. Jan 31, 2019;21(1):e11280. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Sun Y, Zhang Y, Gwizdka J, Trace CB. Consumer evaluation of the quality of online health information: systematic literature review of relevant criteria and indicators. J Med Internet Res. May 2, 2019;21(5):e12522. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Garfinkle R, Wong-Chong N, Petrucci A, et al. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. May 2019;21(5):523-531. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Storino A, Castillo-Angeles M, Watkins AA, et al. Assessing the accuracy and readability of online health information for patients with pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg. Sep 1, 2016;151(9):831. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Patient behavior and the benefits of artificial intelligence: the perils of “dangerous” literacy and illusory patient empowerment. Patient Educ Couns. Aug 2013;92(2):223-228. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Varady NH, Dee EC, Katz JN. International assessment on quality and content of internet information on osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. Aug 2018;26(8):1017-1026. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Europeans becoming enthusiastic users of online health information. European Commission. URL: https:/​/ec.​europa.eu/​digital-single-market/​en/​news/​europeans-becoming-enthusiastic-users-online-healthinformation [Accessed 2022-12-22]
  22. Ghweeba M, Lindenmeyer A, Shishi S, Abbas M, Waheed A, Amer S. What predicts online health information-seeking behavior among Egyptian adults? A cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. Jun 22, 2017;19(6):e216. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Al-Shorbaji N. E-health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a decade of challenges and achievements. East Mediterr Health J. 2008;14 Suppl:S157-S173. [Medline]
  24. AlSaadi MM. Evaluation of internet use for health information by parents of asthmatic children attending pediatric clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2012;32(6):630-636. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Wang X, Shi J, Kong H. Online health information seeking: a review and meta-analysis. Health Commun. Sep 2021;36(10):1163-1175. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Wong DKK, Cheung MK. Online health information seeking and eHealth literacy among patients attending a primary care clinic in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. Mar 27, 2019;21(3):e10831. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Xiong Z, Zhang L, Li Z, Xu W, Zhang Y, Ye T. Frequency of online health information seeking and types of information sought among the general Chinese population: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. Dec 2, 2021;23(12):e30855. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Zhang D, Zhan W, Zheng C, et al. Online health information-seeking behaviors and skills of Chinese college students. BMC Public Health. Apr 15, 2021;21(1):736. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Qiu Y, Ren W, Liu Y, Yin P, Ren J. Online health information in a rural residential population in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. May 5, 2019;9(5):e026202. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Liu L. Medical information seeking behavior of urban patients in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. Aug 21, 2022;22(1):1591. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  31. China statistical yearbook [Article in Chinese]. National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2023. URL: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2023/indexch.htm [Accessed 2025-04-03]
  32. Chongqing statistical yearbook. Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. 2023. URL: https:/​/tjj.​cq.gov.cn/​zwgk_233/​tjnj/​tjnj.html?url=https:/​/tjj.​cq.gov.cn/​cslm/​tjsjzl/​202409/​P020240913357156130170.​pdf [Accessed 2025-04-03]
  33. Nguyen A, Mosadeghi S, Almario CV. Persistent digital divide in access to and use of the Internet as a resource for health information: results from a California population-based study. Int J Med Inform. Jul 2017;103:49-54. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Waligóra J, Mastalerz-Migas A. The internet as a source of health information and services. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1211:1-16. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  35. Powell J, Inglis N, Ronnie J, Large S. The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. Feb 23, 2011;13(1):e20. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, et al. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. Mar 28, 2011;171(6):568-574. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Hsu J, Huang J, Kinsman J, et al. Use of e-Health services between 1999 and 2002: a growing digital divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(2):164-171. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Graetz I, Gordon N, Fung V, Hamity C, Reed ME. The digital divide and patient portals: internet access explained differences in patient portal use for secure messaging by age, race, and income. Med Care. Aug 2016;54(8):772-779. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Gao H, Dutta M, Okoror T. Listening to Chinese immigrant restaurant workers in the Midwest: application of the culture-centered approach (CCA) to explore perceptions of health and health care. Health Commun. 2016;31(6):727-737. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  40. Dutta MJ. Culture-centered approach in addressing health disparities: communication infrastructures for subaltern voices. Commun Methods Meas. Oct 2, 2018;12(4):239-259. [CrossRef]
  41. Dutta MJ. A culture-centered approach to listening: voices of social change. Int J List. May 4, 2014;28(2):67-81. [CrossRef]
  42. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav. Oct 2004;7(5):497-510. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  43. Singh S, Banerjee A. Internet and doctor-patient relationship: cross-sectional study of patients’ perceptions and practices. Indian J Public Health. 2019;63(3):215-219. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  44. Goldner M, Hale TM, Cotten SR, Stern MJ, Drentea P. The intersection of gender and place in online health activities. J Health Commun. 2013;18(10):1235-1255. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  45. The 50th statistical report on China’s internet development [Article in Chinese]. China Internet Network Information. URL: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-08/31/content_5707608.htm [Accessed 2025-04-03]
  46. Zach L, Dalrymple PW, Rogers ML, Williver-Farr H. Assessing internet access and use in a medically underserved population: implications for providing enhanced health information services. Health Info Libr J. Mar 2012;29(1):61-71. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. Ibrahim AMS, Vargas CR, Koolen PGL, Chuang DJ, Lin SJ, Lee BT. Readability of online patient resources for melanoma. Melanoma Res. Feb 2016;26(1):58-65. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  48. Vargas CR, Chuang DJ, Ganor O, Lee BT. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer. Surgery. Aug 2014;156(2):311-318. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  49. McCloud RF, Okechukwu CA, Sorensen G, Viswanath K. Beyond access: barriers to internet health information seeking among the urban poor. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Nov 2016;23(6):1053-1059. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  50. Wang Z, Wang S, Zhang Y, Jiang X. Social media usage and online professionalism among registered nurses: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. Oct 2019;98:19-26. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. Notification of the National Health Commission on printing the guidelines of generating and spreading health science popularization information [Article in Chinese]. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. 2015. URL: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm?id=5fe32b5a1a8243e2bd819f9eeebfd8b1 [Accessed 2025-04-03]
  52. Li W, Han LQ, Guo YJ, Sun J. Using WeChat official accounts to improve malaria health literacy among Chinese expatriates in Niger: an intervention study. Malar J. Nov 24, 2016;15(1):567. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  53. Zhou J, Liu F, Zhou H. Understanding health food messages on Twitter for health literacy promotion. Perspect Public Health. May 2018;138(3):173-179. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  54. Ma X, Lu J, Liu W. Influencing factors on health information to improve public health literacy in the official WeChat account of Guangzhou CDC. Front Public Health. 2021;9:657082. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  55. Zhang X, Wen D, Liang J, Lei J. How the public uses social media WeChat to obtain health information in China: a survey study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Jul 5, 2017;17(Suppl 2):66. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  56. A Rahim AI, Ibrahim MI, A Salim FN, Ariffin MAI. Health information engagement factors in Malaysia: a content analysis of Facebook use by the Ministry of Health in 2016 and 2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Feb 18, 2019;16(4):591. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  57. Ahmed Shaikh Z, Ali Sathio A, Ali Laghari A, Ahmed Memon M, Hussain Mirani I. Study of the role of new technologies in pharmaceutical industry. J Pharm Res Int. 2019;31:1-11. [CrossRef]
  58. Miller LMS, Bell RA. Online health information seeking: the influence of age, information trustworthiness, and search challenges. J Aging Health. Apr 2012;24(3):525-541. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  59. Zhang X, Wang X, Tian F, Xu D, Fan L. Anticipating the antecedents of feedback-seeking behavior in digital environments: a socio-technical system perspective. Internet Res. Mar 28, 2023;33(1):388-409. [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang X, Yan X, Cao X, Sun Y, Chen H, She J. The role of perceived e-health literacy in users’ continuance intention to use mobile healthcare applications: an exploratory empirical study in China. Inf Technol Dev. Apr 3, 2018;24(2):198-223. [CrossRef]


OHIS: online health information–seeking
OR: odds ratio


Edited by Amaryllis Mavragani; submitted 06.01.24; peer-reviewed by Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang, Xi Zhang; final revised version received 08.02.25; accepted 20.02.25; published 05.05.25.

Copyright

© Honghui Rong, Lu Lu, Miao He, Tian Guo, Xian Li, Qingliu Tao, Yixin Li, Chuanfen Zheng, Ling Zhang, Fengju Li, Dali Yi, Enyu Lei, Ting Luo, Qinghua Yang, Ji-an Chen. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 5.5.2025.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.


OSZAR »